Related Video Collections
All Comments
Why are people leaking so many celebrities nude photos? like if a nude photos of a regular person is leaked its against the law.
but for celebrities it seems like a nude photo leaks and its not a big deal and it gets them more movie deals and more music deals.
now if it is truly voyeurism and invasion of privacy to film or take nude photos of someone, why aren't all the nude photos and sex tapes of celebrities taken off the internet? | Many of those are publicity stunts.
Those picutres are not accidentally leaked at all.
The publicist for the celebrity merely made it look like the photos were leaked.
If people knew that the photos were merely aprt of a publicity stunt few people would pay attention.
However if the photos are supposed to be secret photos that were leaked, then many more people will pay attention. | What is the opposite of voyeurism? Strange question I know, but someone today said it's exhibitionism but I remember reading somewhere that it's not, and it's bugging me!
There's a technical word for someone who gets a sexual kick from 'accidentally' exposing themselves to someone - not overt trenchcoat flashing, but more like standing in their bedroom nude in the knowledge that if someone looked in they'd see them... any ideas anyone? | I think you're referring to apodysophilia, or Lady Godiva syndrome. :)
Exhibitionism also includes martymachlia, is that what you're thinking of?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martymachli… | I know I'm Straight So what is going on with me? I'm a 14 year old straight female. I know that I'm not bisexual, because I am only attracted to men.
But I notice a couple of things. I have a sneezing fetish, and I only get an orgasm if a woman sneezes. When men sneeze I feel gross, weird, and odd. I get extremely turned on when women sneeze, and I'll watch videos of women sneezing.
I also have Voyeurism, where I get turned on by seeing someone nude, or doing sexual activity (More info- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyeurism ) But mostly, if I see a woman undressing I feel really good, not with men, I once again feel gross. I have OCD so I know that when people in my house sneeze or undress, I can't really stand it, so that has to do with OCD.
I don't like seeing men nude just plain because it's weird.
I like to look at women's bodies, and feel like kissing them on the cheek, or feeling their legs and stomach.
But why is it that with my fetishes, I'm only turned on by women? I am not attracted to women, as in I would never date a woman. I would consider myself Bi- Curious, as in having fantasies, but I am not actually attracted to women, it's more of me wanting to know what it's like to date one, but I don't want to, because I am not attracted to women at all, I don't find them cute or hot, the way I would with guys.
Is there anything else I might have? Is it just my preference? Being Bi-Curious? Anything else I should know about? Thanks, I really appreatcite it. | Dont worry, i think it is just hormones raging and going crazy lol cause since u r a young teen thats when puberty starts.
my opinion but u never no, i guess u could be Bi-Curious | Who is really the artist? I want to present several questions to you: when you see a nude female tied up or submissively posed in a photograph, do you consider it art? Would it help if it were supposed to be representative of a cause? Would it help if the photographer were famous? Would it make a difference if it were hung in a museum/gallery, and gawked at by a crowd? Why would you consider it art?
Here are my thoughts, I have absolutely nothing against artistic nudity, nor do I consider myself a "prude" or "philistine". (I hate this sort of labeling, but lets save that for another topic). What I do have something against, is that artistic nudity is almost always of women. Why is a man's body almost never depicted? Why does his body seem to be off limits? Personally I find the bold, muscular, and sinewy sweat of a man's body to be very appealing, and Greek and Roman sculptures had no problem with it either.
Yet how original can it be when a photographer uses a woman's naked body in a photo? Hasn't this been done about a billion or more times? If a woman's body were poetry, we would hear professors emphatically shouting how cliche and unoriginal she is; how we need something different, especially the whole bondage, tied up scenario, how welcome would that line be? Yet, here we are, still tying women up, stripping them of all their clothes, and having them splayed in front of a camera,
and calling it art.
I would like to ask how this is art. It certainly is not abstract, clearly it is meant to be surreal, so what is the message that we are supposed to get from bound, suffering women with lackluster eyes? Is it a message of oppression? What about the more graphic photos? Are they a message of oppression as well?
To be truthful, I think these images are a sad commentary on our society, maybe another excuse for voyeurism. I see the same depiction of women in short film, television shows, and movies; the damsel in distress, the helpless female running from her chasers, who always seems to trip and fall, or who never uses her brain when she can. She is always wearing revealing clothing, scantily clad, has a dumbfounded look in her eyes as she gazes up at her lover, attacker, rescuer, and is always distraught without a man.
Don't get me wrong, In some ways I don't believe that anyone deliberately sets out to establish gender roles, I think it is embedded in our psyches. I have noticed that in movies women have progressed, but often times, it is the man who is the star, either the protagonist or the antagonist, but the female is usually neither of these, but a subplot, a character in the star's life, a supportive role, or simply eye candy. In other words, she is reduced to an object.
For example, in a lot of action movies, which are mainly marketed towards men, the female (mother, girlfriend) is often guynapped or killed for revenge by a gang. This is dangerously reducing her to an object, as subsequently it happens in real life. Why? Why are women nothing more than possessions or pretty things to look at in the world of art? Why can't art be anything else? Is this not a dangerous way to think, does it not have its repercussions? Models and actresses suffer from eating disorders, and other various mood disorders on a large scale. Our culture has earned the name of "rape culture", and for good reasons. Look at the number of rapes that occur on a daily basis. Look at how women are made to feel as if they have a disorder if they are a-sexual, or have a low libido, even if it is not distressing to them.
I would even venture to say that it is not the photographer who is talented, but the female. She is the one sculpting her body, through diet, sometimes starvation, and strenuous daily exercise. She is the one who has to fit the mold of what society expects her to be. She is the sculptor, the artist. Snapping a picture of a tired old image is not artistic, it is not even original, it is just a borrowed idea.
I wait for the day when women are no longer considered the muse, but actually receive credit for being the artist.
What do you think? | wow... thats a very interesting way of looking at it, from inside out, then back in again from far out...
i consider art to be more like a fantasy, something imaginable, but with as much daring and new porn, the 'art' is being phased out.
check out some art from prisons, if you can... some real good stuff comes from there.
I agree with you in many ways, but there's still great art thats just different and stands out while theres more thats not... photo art is a combination of photographer and model, unless theres a plot to it... like a specific body part, that really anyone couldve taken... and theres many females taking pics of females too.
check out deviantart.com, if you havent, and read up on the photographers view.
cheers | Late-20's attractive female needs BIG advice on Porn and Self-esteem (apology for length)? Recently I realised that my partner has been looking up porn just before/within the hour before we had sex. This applies to two times during the past 24 hours. I don't know if he did this because he felt pressure to perform? I don't think I was pressuring in any way, I thought he was actually the one who brought it up, much earlier in the day. Maybe he regretted "talking it up" and needed a little assistance later so he wouldn't seem like a flake about it? Maybe he wanted sex but knew it would be more fun if he secretly viewed porn first? What about me though? I find it hard to refuse a chance for sex in general, because I like it, but also because part of me fears he will simply go jerk off to some girl on the internet. I don't like "taking it when I can get get it," though, it makes my orgasms less fun and I always feel like I have to just be ready in case. It's no sane person's way of life, I'm pretty sure. It's not fair to me when he looks at porn first, though, because then he's hot for sex and then I have no similar point of reference. Is it me that he wants, or was it someone else...? I am too distracted then, during sex, in wondering if I just happened to be there at the right moment. We've been desperately in love since 2008, and are still very happy in every other way. The problem so far: the moment I stop caring about what he does regarding porn seems to always coincide with whether I care about HIM. I would rather him be turned on by me, not other girls. It just makes me not want to have sex with him at all. I am a hot blonde, 5'8", and in my opinion usually much more attractive than the girls who have their legs spread open in little boxes with pink and purple borders on their slutty web pages. I have volunteered to watch porn together sometimes before having sex, so we might learn about what turns us on in other people. Instead, I find out later that he was doing this by himself and I feel really used. It makes me feel like going out and cheating on him, but I never do. Honestly, he's the one I want to have sex with, and I know it's not the answer. The cheating temptation for me is reactionary, like I instantly feel the need to make sure I can be other people's fantasies as easily as others seem to become his fantasy. I definitely do look at porn to get off by myself, but I wonder how he would feel if he discovered I'd been doing that before we had sex, just to get turned on? Or, is he becoming turned on by something random, and then wanting me spontaneously? How would he feel upon discovery that I'd been getting heavy-breathing to much more muscular dudes before approaching HIM for sex? I don't know where our future stands because I can't seem to stop thinking about this in a negative way. Is the answer to stop caring about him in a certain way? Is that answer to think less highly of myself? These seem to be the problems: that I think too highly of him and especially of myself. I have done erotic photography shoots and enjoy frequenting sex toys shops occasionally, anything I can think of to "loosen up" and be part of what ails me. There are nude pictures online of me, forever, as a result of my attempts to join a world that seems to separate us. I have a membership to a porn site that I like very much, so it's not that I think porn is terrible. I just feel so limited as a woman, somehow. Is it just that I think I'm Wonderful? How silly, my double standards? I have fun with toys, and it iS hot to turn other people on. What if that's MY fantasy whereas my boyfriend's habit is voyeurism? Where does this leave me and why don't those two things seem to align? If I am having trouble dealing with this now, and I'm young and attractive, how will I ever come to terms with this type of behaviour when I'm 50? Please, constructive comments only. I need a pep talk and I guess I just want to hear how other people deal with their own self-esteem to stay happy.
I cannot afford to keep pushing this conversation at home, in case you were wondering. Any suggestions for cognitive behavioral therapy or mindset- readjustments would be much appreciated.
Sincerely,
hot sarah, tearful | | What is the difference between you watching porn to orgasm and him watching porn before you have sex? You're splitting hairs, here. If you have a problem with something your partner does, you have no room to complain if you do it too. You can't control when he does and doesn't watch porn. You have both invited porn into your relationship, so I don't see the problem. Have you tried explaining all of this to him? I think that's a really good place to start. | I know I'm Straight So what is going on with me? I'm a 14 year old straight female. I know that I'm not bisexual, because I am only attracted to men.
But I notice a couple of things. I have a sneezing fetish, and I only get an orgasm if a woman sneezes. When men sneeze I feel gross, weird, and odd. I get extremely turned on when women sneeze, and I'll watch videos of women sneezing.
I also have Voyeurism, where I get turned on by seeing someone nude, or doing sexual activity (More info- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyeurism ) But mostly, if I see a woman undressing I feel really good, not with men, I once again feel gross. I have OCD so I know that when people in my house sneeze or undress, I can't really stand it, so that has to do with OCD.
I don't like seeing men nude just plain because it's weird.
I like to look at women's bodies, and feel like kissing them on the cheek, or feeling their legs and stomach.
But why is it that with my fetishes, I'm only turned on by women? I am not attracted to women, as in I would never date a woman. I would consider myself Bi- Curious, as in having fantasies, but I am not actually attracted to women, it's more of me wanting to know what it's like to date one, but I don't want to, because I am not attracted to women at all, I don't find them cute or hot, the way I would with guys.
Is there anything else I might have? Is it just my preference? Being Bi-Curious? Anything else I should know about? Thanks, I really appreatcite it. | You say you are not attracted to women, but all the things you say about them sounds like you are - liking them undress, wanting to touch them etc.
Because we are brought up in a society where there are more hetro couples (man and women rather than same sex), as a society we find it strange to imagine having a relationship with someone of the same sex, so that may be why you don't imagine yourself having a relationship with women.
Women's bodies are beautiful and so it is not completely strange to find that attractive. There is no reason to label it bi-curious or anything I don't think, you are just appreciating something gorgeous.
I think you should stay open to the fact you do find girls attractive and if something happens with that, then cool. If not, also cool.
Hope that helps, good luck x |
|